News Summary
A lawsuit has been filed against the South Carolina Department of Education, alleging discrimination against Black viewpoints due to a law that restricts certain educational content. The law prohibits teaching concepts related to racial superiority and has led to the removal of significant literary works from school curriculums. The plaintiffs seek to halt the law’s enforcement, claiming it violates constitutional rights. Educators report fears that the law stifles essential discussions in classrooms, emphasizing the ongoing tension between education and civil rights in the state.
Columbia, South Carolina – A federal lawsuit has been filed against the South Carolina Department of Education, claiming that the department discriminates against Black viewpoints through its enforcement of a state law that restricts certain educational content. The lawsuit was initiated on Monday by a coalition consisting of the South Carolina NAACP, educators, students, and librarians, targeting State Superintendent Ellen Weaver and two Lexington County school districts.
The plaintiffs argue that the contentious law, which prohibits teaching that any race is inherently superior or instills automatic racism, has resulted in the systematic removal of essential history lessons and literature authored by Black writers. This law was approved in 2021 as part of the state budget, with schools facing loss of funding if they fail to comply. Specifically, the legislation bans the teaching of eight concepts, including the idea that an individual’s worth can be determined by their race. Additionally, it stipulates that lesson content should not induce psychological distress based on race or sex, a stipulation that has raised concerns about the vagueness of its language.
The impact of this law has been significant, with its restrictions contributing to the exclusion of an African American Studies course from the state’s list of Advanced Placement (AP) classes. Although schools are still permitted to offer honors courses in African American history, any associated costs for AP testing will be the responsibility of students or their respective school districts, rather than the state.
The lawsuit seeks to halt the enforcement of the law, which the plaintiffs claim violates constitutional rights related to freedom of speech and equal protection. Among the notable literary works removed from school curricula and libraries are “Between the World and Me” by Ta-Nehisi Coates and “Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You” by Ibram X. Kendi. The plaintiffs contend that the education department’s withdrawal of these books is an assault on Black culture and history.
Educators across the state have reported feelings of uncertainty and fear regarding the discussion of sensitive subjects in classrooms due to apprehensions of repercussions under the law. The restrictions imposed by this legislation are said to limit essential discussions surrounding pivotal historical events, such as the Holocaust and wage disparities based on gender. A librarian from Chapin High School has noted an increase in scrutiny regarding her responsibilities following the law’s implementation.
Amid concerns about the law, both political parties in the legislature have expressed apprehensions that its language would hinder educational instruction. Prior efforts to amend the law in June 2023 ultimately did not gain traction. Legal representatives for the plaintiffs cite comparisons between the current restrictive measures and historical discriminatory laws, emphasizing that legislative approval does not equate to constitutional soundness.
Despite the lawsuit’s accusations, the South Carolina Department of Education maintains its commitment to educating students about both the “tragedies and triumphs” of history. However, legislators have indicated that gaining bipartisan support for potential amendments to the law may be challenging, particularly as political dynamics shift following recent elections.
Overall, this legal action highlights the intersection of education and civil rights in South Carolina, raising fundamental questions about how historical events and current social issues are taught in schools across the state. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for the future of educational policies and racial inclusivity within South Carolina’s school systems.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Mass Shooting at Memorial Day Weekend Party in Little River
South Carolina Chamber Urges Trump’s Action on Commerce Secretary
Hooters Permanently Closes Over 30 Locations Amid Bankruptcy
South Carolina Court Postpones Hearing for Atlantic Coast Life Insurance
Data Security Incident Delays Bonuses for Lexington-Richland Staff
South Carolina Criminalizes Revenge Porn with New Legislation
Sheriff of Spartanburg County Resigns Amid Controversy
Sheriff Chuck Wright Resigns Amid Investigations
Chris Murphy Faces Divorce Lawsuit Amid Alcohol Abuse Claims
South Carolina Leads the Nation in Public School Book Bans
Additional Resources
- SC Daily Gazette
- Wikipedia: Race and Education in the United States
- ABC Columbia
- Google Search: South Carolina education censorship
- WIS TV
- Google Scholar: censorship in education
- ABC News
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Race and Education
